✦ · ✦ · ✦
The 1928 Book of Common Prayer & the Anglican Missal
A Concordance of Points of Supplement, Enrichment, and Divergence, and Canonical Practice
Anglican Missal only 1928 BCP only Both forms

Background

The Anglican Missal is a manual of enriched propers and ceremonial for the Holy Communion, compiled within the Anglo-Catholic stream of Anglicanism and drawing primarily on the Sarum Use, the pre-Tridentine Roman Rite, and the 1549 First Prayer Book. It does not replace the 1928 Book of Common Prayer but supplements it, providing fuller propers — Introits, Graduals, Sequences, Postcommunions, and ceremonial rubrics — for Sundays and feast days. Its use in the Continuing Anglican Church presupposes the 1928 BCP as the canonical text; the Missal adds to it rather than substituting for it.

The Two Traditions

The differences between the two forms are not arbitrary. They reflect two distinct streams of Anglican liturgical development — both legitimate, both rooted in the Reformation settlement, each carrying its own historical rationale.

Reformational Form
The Lord's Prayer and Collect for Purity open the service. The Gloria in Excelsis follows the Post-Communion Prayer, closing the service. The Kyrie is threefold. Propers are limited to Collect, Epistle, and Gospel. No Introit, Gradual, or Sequence. The Epistle and Gospel pericopes are those appointed in the 1928 BCP. This is the form normative at NEM.
Anglican Missal — Tractarian Enrichment
The service opens with the Preparation (Psalm 43, prayers at the foot of the altar). The ninefold Kyrie follows, then the Gloria in Excelsis at the opening. An Introit, Gradual, Sequence (on principal feasts), and Postcommunion are added. The Missal pericopes sometimes differ from or extend the 1928 BCP lections. This is the form normative in parishes using the enriched ceremonial tradition.

Historical Roots of the Gloria's Position

The position of the Gloria in Excelsis is perhaps the most immediately audible difference between the two forms. E. Crewdson Thomas traces the history precisely in The Lay Folks' History of the Liturgy (Rivingtons, 1929): in the First Prayer Book of Edward VI (1549), the Gloria was placed at the end of the service — following ancient Gallican and Eastern practice, and the Sarum Mass before it. In the Second Prayer Book (1552), Cranmer moved it to the beginning of the service as a deliberate theological statement, removing it from its sacrificial context and placing it in the position of praise opening a preaching service.

The 1928 BCP retains the 1552 position — Gloria at the close, after the Post-Communion. The Anglican Missal restores the opening Gloria as part of the fuller ceremonial sequence derived from the Sarum Use. A low churchman using the 1928 BCP plain form is therefore using the older Gallican tradition, while the Missal's opening Gloria reflects the later 1552 Reformation order repositioned ceremonially.

NEM uses the 1928 BCP plain form. The Gloria in Excelsis is sung or said after the Post-Communion Prayer, closing the service — the position of the 1549 First Prayer Book and the Sarum Mass. This is the normative NEM practice.

Comparative Order

The table below maps the complete order of the Holy Communion in both forms, showing where they align, where the Missal adds material, and where the sequence diverges.

1928 BCP Plain FormAnglican Missal Enriched FormNote
Preparation (Ps. 43, prayers at foot of altar)Missal addition from Sarum Use
Lord's Prayer (said privately by priest)BCP only; suppressed in Missal ceremonial
Collect for PurityCollect for PurityBoth forms; taken from Liturgy of St. Chrysostom
Ten Commandments (or Summary of the Law)Ninefold KyrieDiverge here: BCP uses Commandments as examination; Missal uses the ancient litanic Kyrie
Gloria in ExcelsisMissal: Gloria opens, following 1552 BCP position; omitted in Advent & Lent
Collect of the DayIntroit · Collect of the DayMissal adds Introit (psalm verse) before Collect
EpistleEpistle · Gradual (or Alleluia)Missal adds Gradual between Epistle and Gospel; pericopes may differ
GospelSequence (principal feasts) · GospelMissal adds Sequence hymn on great feasts
Nicene CreedNicene CreedBoth forms
SermonSermonBoth forms
Offertory Sentences · OfferingOffertory · LavaboMissal adds ceremonial washing of hands
Prayer for the Church MilitantPrayer for the Church MilitantBoth; 1662 addition of prayer for departed in Missal
Exhortation · Invitation · Confession · Absolution · Comfortable WordsAs BCPBoth forms; position slightly adjusted in Missal
Sursum Corda · Proper Preface · SanctusSursum Corda · Proper Preface · Sanctus · Benedictus qui venitMissal adds Benedictus qui venit after Sanctus
Prayer of Humble AccessPrayer of Humble AccessBoth forms
Prayer of ConsecrationPrayer of Consecration (with manual acts)Missal specifies full ceremonial manual acts
Communion of priest and people · Agnus Dei (optional)Agnus Dei · CommunionMissal positions Agnus Dei before Communion
Lord's Prayer · Prayer of Oblation or ThanksgivingPostcommunion proper · Lord's PrayerMissal substitutes proper Postcommunion for the day
Gloria in ExcelsisBCP: Gloria closes. Already said at opening in Missal.
BlessingLast Gospel (John 1:1–14) · BlessingMissal adds Last Gospel; BCP omits it
The Kyrie
Threefold vs. Ninefold Kyrie
A difference of ancient lineage, not of doctrine

The Kyrie eleison — Lord have mercy — is the most ancient element of the Christian Liturgy, adopted by the Church between 300 and 400, and derived from the Greek litanic tradition of the Eastern liturgies. In the Sarum Mass it was sung in the ninefold form: Kyrie eleison three times, Christe eleison three times, Kyrie eleison three times — the ninefold Kyrie of the Anglican Missal.

The 1552 Prayer Book replaced the ninefold Kyrie with a threefold response to the Ten Commandments. The Missal restores the ninefold Kyrie as the response of penitence before the Gloria. The BCP threefold form (Lord have mercy upon us, Christ have mercy upon us, Lord have mercy upon us) retains the ancient words but simplifies the structure.

Thomas notes that the ninefold Kyrie is the sole relic of the original bidding prayers of the Mass — the Deacon summoning the people to pray for specific intentions, to each of which the congregation responded Kyrie eleison. When those bidding prayers were compressed into the ninefold form, the Kyrie became a fixed penitential act rather than a congregational response, and in that form it passed into the Sarum Mass and thence into the Anglican Missal.

The Gloria in Excelsis
At the Opening vs. At the Close
The most immediately audible difference between the two forms

In the 1928 BCP plain form, the Gloria in Excelsis is sung or said after the Post-Communion Prayer, closing the service. This follows the 1549 First Prayer Book and the Sarum Mass, and is the older Gallican and Eastern position. It gives the service a eucharistic arc: the people come to the table in penitence, receive the Body and Blood of the Lord, and depart with the song of the angels on their lips.

In the Anglican Missal, the Gloria is sung at the opening of the service after the Kyrie, following the 1552 revision. It is omitted in Advent and Lent. This position treats the Gloria as a festive opening hymn of praise, setting the tone of the service before the Liturgy of the Word begins.

1928 BCP / NEM
Gloria after Post-Communion · The 1549 position · Gallican and Sarum tradition · Gives the service a eucharistic close
Anglican Missal — Enriched Form
Gloria after the Kyrie · The 1552 repositioned order restored ceremonially · Omitted Advent & Lent · Opens the service with festal praise

Both positions are canonical and historically grounded. The low church tradition that places the Gloria at the close is not a diminished form — it is the older form, and the one the 1928 BCP preserves.

The Dismissal
The Last Gospel — John 1:1–14
The Prologue of St. John said at the foot of the altar after the Blessing

The Anglican Missal closes every Mass with the Last Gospel — the Prologue of St. John (In the beginning was the Word, John 1:1–14), said by the priest at the foot of the altar after the Blessing. The congregation kneels at the words And the Word was made flesh.

The Last Gospel is absent from the 1928 BCP. It entered the Roman Rite in the mediaeval period, was carried into the Sarum Use, and passed into the Anglican Missal as a closing act of adoration of the Incarnate Word — a fitting theological conclusion to the Eucharistic celebration. Its Johannine theology of the Incarnation completes the Christological arc of the service.

Not used at NEM. When celebrating according to the Missal form, the Last Gospel follows the Blessing. The congregation kneels at Et Verbum caro factum est — And the Word was made flesh.

Where the Missal Propers Diverge from the 1928 BCP

The Anglican Missal provides a fuller set of propers than the 1928 BCP for each Sunday and feast day. These include the Introit (a psalm verse sung at the entry), the Gradual (sung between Epistle and Gospel), the Sequence (a hymn on principal feasts), and the Postcommunion (a proper prayer of thanksgiving after Communion). Where the Missal's Epistle or Gospel pericope differs from the 1928 BCP appointment, or where the Missal's proper presupposes a longer text than the BCP provides, this is noted below.

Easter I · Low Sunday · First Sunday after Easter
The Postcommunion and the Truncated Gospel
The closing proper makes reference that the 1928 BCP Gospel does not support

This entry documents a discrepancy between the Missal Postcommunion and the 1928 BCP's Low Sunday Gospel pericope, noted in pastoral reflection on the appointed texts for the day. It is the first formally documented discrepancy in this concordance and stands as the model for entries of this type.

The Gospel Pericope

The 1928 BCP appoints for Low Sunday the Gospel of John 20:19–31 — the appearance of the Risen Christ to the disciples on Easter evening, Thomas's absence, and the second appearance eight days later in which Thomas makes his confession My Lord and my God. The pericope as commonly read concludes at verse 29 — the beatitude spoken over those who have not seen and yet have believed.

The fuller Johannine pericope continues through verses 30–31, which provide the Evangelist's own explicit statement of purpose for the entire Gospel:

And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name. John 20:30–31

These two verses do not merely conclude the pericope — they are the theological hinge of the Fourth Gospel. The Evangelist is declaring that the entire Gospel, including the Thomas narrative, was composed precisely to elicit and sustain the faith that Thomas confesses. The closing verse of the Thomas narrative is also the closing verse of the Gospel's original ending.

The Missal Postcommunion

The Anglican Missal's Postcommunion for Low Sunday keys to this fuller text. Its reference to believing and receiving life through the name of Christ — which echoes verse 31 directly — makes full theological sense only when the Gospel has been read through verse 31. When the 1928 BCP pericope ends at verse 29, the Postcommunion's reference hangs without its scriptural anchor, and the liturgical arc of the day is left incomplete.

1928 BCP Gospel
John 20:19–29

Ends: "Blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed."
The beatitude is the climax. Verse 31 — the purpose statement — is absent.
Anglican Missal Gospel
John 20:19–31

Ends: "…that believing ye might have life through his name."
The Evangelist's own purpose statement is present. The Postcommunion's reference is grounded.

The Theological Significance

The omission of verses 30–31 from the 1928 BCP is not an error of carelessness but a feature of the American BCP's tendency to prune Gospel pericopes to their narrative core, removing the Evangelist's own commentary. In the case of Low Sunday, the cost of this pruning is particularly high because verse 31 is not a mere appendix to the Thomas narrative — it is its theological explanation. Thomas confesses My Lord and my God; the Evangelist immediately tells us why that confession matters: these things are written that ye might believe. The two verses belong together.

Practical note for NEM: When the Anglican Missal form is used on Low Sunday, the Gospel should be read through verse 31. When using the 1928 BCP plain form at NEM, the officiant may note in the homily that the appointed pericope has been purposefully extended, or may read through verse 31 as a matter of pastoral completeness. The rubrical tradition does not prohibit reading a longer pericope than the BCP appoints.
Advent · Christmas · Epiphanytide
Introits, Graduals & Sequences — Principal Seasons
To be documented · Entries forthcoming

This section will document the Introits, Graduals, and Sequences appointed in the Anglican Missal for the principal seasons of the liturgical year — Advent, Christmastide, and Epiphanytide — noting where the Missal's psalm verses and chants enrich or diverge from the 1928 BCP plain form.

Entries will be added as they are identified and verified, following the model of the Low Sunday documentation above.

This entry is a placeholder. Contributions and observations are welcome.
Lent · Holy Week · Eastertide
Penitential Seasons — Propers & Divergences
To be documented · Entries forthcoming

The penitential seasons — Septuagesima-tide, Lent, and Holy Week — are where the Anglican Missal's enrichment of the 1928 BCP is most extensive, with tracts, sequences, and ceremonial additions (the stripping of the altar, the Mass of the Presanctified) that have no parallel in the BCP plain form.

This section will document those additions and any discrepancies between the Missal pericopes and the 1928 BCP appointments during these seasons.

Canonical Standing of Both Forms

The use of the Anglican Missal within the Continuing Anglican tradition generally rests on a shared principle: the plain 1928 BCP and the enriched Missal are both received as legitimate liturgical options, subject to the ordinary's oversight under the historic principle of jus liturgicum.

Both Forms Are Legitimate

Within this tradition, both the 1928 BCP plain form and the enriched Anglican Missal form are received as legitimate options for the celebration of the Holy Communion. Neither is a departure from canonical order. The Missal is not a deviation from the Prayer Book tradition — it is a supplement to it, operating within the same doctrinal framework defined by the Thirty-Nine Articles, the 1928 BCP, and the Apostolic Succession.

Two Norms, One Tradition

At many parishes in this tradition, the Anglican Missal is the normative form for the Holy Communion. New Every Morning Anglican Fellowship, by contrast, follows the 1928 BCP plain form as its normative practice.

NEM — Reformational Form
1928 BCP plain form · Gloria at close · Threefold Kyrie · No Introit or Gradual · Normative for NEM
Anglican Missal — Tractarian Enrichment
Anglican Missal enriched form · Gloria at opening · Ninefold Kyrie · Full Introit, Gradual, Postcommunion · Normative at Missal-using parishes

Implications for NEM Members Attending a Missal Parish

Members of New Every Morning Anglican Fellowship who attend services at a parish using the Anglican Missal will find the liturgy in the enriched Missal form. The order of service differs from NEM's practice at several points — principally the position of the Gloria, the ninefold Kyrie, the Introit and Gradual, and the Last Gospel. These differences do not indicate a different theology but a different ceremonial tradition within the same broader tradition.

A worshipper familiar with NEM's plain form will find the Missal form fuller, more ceremonially elaborate, and in several respects closer to the pre-Reformation Sarum Use from which both traditions ultimately derive.

Thomas on the Historical Development

E. Crewdson Thomas's account of the Holy Communion in The Lay Folks' History of the Liturgy (Rivingtons, 1929) provides the clearest short account of how the present differences arose. His key points, relevant to this concordance:

YearDevelopmentRelevance
1549First Prayer Book. Gloria at close. Follows Sarum position. Collect for Purity from Liturgy of St. Chrysostom.Establishes the BCP position of the Gloria that NEM retains.
1552Second Prayer Book. Ninefold Kyrie replaced by Ten Commandments as examination. Gloria moved to opening. Invocation of Holy Spirit dropped from Canon. Oblation removed.The theological reshaping Cranmer imposed. The Missal partly reverses this.
1559Elizabethan revision. Words of administration from 1549 and 1552 combined. Ornaments Rubric.Establishes the ceremonial baseline for the Missal tradition.
1662Manual acts restored. Prayer for departed added to Church Militant. Black Rubric altered. "Real and essential" changed to "corporal."1662 is the English standard the Missal presupposes for much of its Canon.
1928 (USA)American revision. Slight reordering. No Introit, Gradual, or Sequence appointed. Some Gospel pericopes pruned from their Sarum length.The BCP form NEM uses. The pruned pericopes (including Low Sunday) are an American feature.
The Anglican Missal does not represent a departure from Anglicanism toward Rome. It represents a recovery of the pre-Reformation English ceremonial tradition that Cranmer's 1552 revision deliberately dismantled. Its continued use is an affirmation that both the reformed tradition of 1549 and the more elaborate ceremonial of the Sarum Use are legitimate expressions of Anglican worship.

This concordance was prepared for New Every Morning Anglican Fellowship in the season of Eastertide, Anno Domini 2026. Source material: E. Crewdson Thomas, The Lay Folks' History of the Liturgy (Rivingtons, 1929); The Anglican Missal (Society of SS. Peter and Paul, various editions); the 1928 Book of Common Prayer.